TO MAKE LAWFUL AND TO PROHIBIT IS THE RIGHT OF ALLAH ALONE
ASSEMBLED BY MALLAM ABBA ABANA,
KUBWA, ABUJA, NIGERIA
https://web.facebook.com/abba.abana
emails:gonidamgamiri@yahoo.com; abba.abana@gmail.com
Praise be to Allaah; we seek His help and His forgiveness. We seek
refuge with Allaah from the evil of our own souls and from our bad deeds.
Whomsoever Allaah guides will never be led astray, and whomsoever Allaah leaves
astray, no one can guide. I bear witness that there
is no god but Allaah, and I bear witness that Muhammad (Sallalhu
alaihi Wasalam) is His slave and
Messenger.
THE ISLAMIC PRINCIPLES PERTAINING TO HALAL AND
HARAM:
TO MAKE LAWFUL AND TO PROHIBIT IS THE RIGHT OF ALLAH
ALONE
The
principle is that Islam has restricted the authority to legislate the haram and the halal, taking it out of the
hands of human beings, regardless of their religious or worldly position, and
reserving it for the Lord of human beings alone. Neither rabbis nor priests,
kings or sultans, National Assembly or legislations have the right to prohibit
something permanently to Allah's servants; if someone does this, he has
certainly exceeded his limits, usurping the sovereignty which, with respect to
legislating for the people, belongs to Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala alone. Others
who acquiesce with this transgression of such usurpers and act upon what they
have legislated thereby elevate them to the rank of partners or associates with
Allah:
Do they have partners (with Allah) who have prescribed for them in religion that concerning which Allah has given no permission? (Holy Quran Chapter 42:21)
They have taken their rabbis and priests as lords besides Allah, and the Messiah, son of Mary, although they were commanded to worship no one except the One Allah. There is no Deity but He, glory be to Him above what they associate with Him! (Holy Quran Chapter 9:31)
The
Qur'an took to task the People of the Book, that is, Christians and Jews, for
putting the power to make lawful and to prohibit things and actions into the
hands of their rabbis and priests.
'Adi
bin Hatim, who had been a Christian before accepting Islam, once came to the
Prophet (peace be on him). When he heard him reciting the above ayah he said, "O
Messenger of Allah, but they do not worship them." The Prophet (peace be
on him) replied, Yes, but they prohibit to
the people what is halal and permit them what is haram, and the people obey them. This is
indeed their worship of them. (Reported and classified as hasan by al-Tirmidhi and
others.)
Christians
still claim that Jesus (peace be on him), before ascending to heaven, vested in
His apostles the authority to declare things permissible or prohibited as they
saw fit, as reported in Matthew 18:18:
I tell you this: whatever you forbid on earth shall be forbidden in heaven, and whatever you allow on earth shall be allowed in heaven.
I tell you this: whatever you forbid on earth shall be forbidden in heaven, and whatever you allow on earth shall be allowed in heaven.
The
Qur'an also took up task for legislating and prohibiting things without any
authority from Allah:
Do you see what Allah has sent down to you for sustenance and yet you have made some part of it halal and some part haram? (Holy Quran Chapter 10:59)
And do not say, concerning the falsehood which your tongues utter, 'This is halal and that is haram,' in order to fabricate a lie against Allah; assuredly those who fabricate a lie against Allah will not prosper. (Holy Quran Chapter 16:116)
From
these explicit verses of the Qur'an and from clear ahadith of the Prophet
(peace be on him), the jurists of Islam grasped with certainty that it is Allah
Subhanahu wa Ta'ala alone Who has the right to make lawful or to prohibit a
matter, either through His Book or through the tongue of His Messenger (peace
be on him). The jurists' task does not go beyond explaining what Allah has
decreed to be halal or haram "when He has explained
to you in detail what He has made haram for you." (Holy Quran
Chapter 6:119) It is definitely not their task to decide what is to be allowed
and what is to be prohibited to human beings. Thus the great jurists, in spite
of their scholarship and ability of ijtihad (deduction from
analogy), shied away from pronouncing judgments concerning matters of halal and haram, passing the problem
from one to the other out of fear of committing the error of declaring halal what is actually haram and vice-versa.
In
his book Al-Umm, Imam Shafi'i
narrated that Abu Yusuf, a companion of Abu Hanifah and a chief judge (qadi), said:
I know that our knowledgeable teachers avoided saying, 'This is halal and that is haram,' apart from what they found clearly stated without requiring an interpretation in the Book of Allah. We have been told by Ibn al-Saib that al-Rabi' bin Khaytham, one of the greatest of the second generation Muslims, said, 'Beware that none of you says, "Allah has made this lawful or approves of it," and that Allah may then say that He did not make it lawful nor approve it, or that you say, "Allah has prohibited this," and that Allah may then say, "You lie! I did not prohibit it nor disapprove of it." Some companions of Ibrahim alNakh'i, a great jurist of Kufah among the second generation Muslims, have told us of his mentioning his colleagues as saying, when they gave a judgement concerning something, 'It is disapproved' or 'There is no harm in it,' rather than, 'It is haram' or 'It is halal,' as haram and halal are terms of much greater import. (AI-Umm, vol. 7, p. 317.)
I know that our knowledgeable teachers avoided saying, 'This is halal and that is haram,' apart from what they found clearly stated without requiring an interpretation in the Book of Allah. We have been told by Ibn al-Saib that al-Rabi' bin Khaytham, one of the greatest of the second generation Muslims, said, 'Beware that none of you says, "Allah has made this lawful or approves of it," and that Allah may then say that He did not make it lawful nor approve it, or that you say, "Allah has prohibited this," and that Allah may then say, "You lie! I did not prohibit it nor disapprove of it." Some companions of Ibrahim alNakh'i, a great jurist of Kufah among the second generation Muslims, have told us of his mentioning his colleagues as saying, when they gave a judgement concerning something, 'It is disapproved' or 'There is no harm in it,' rather than, 'It is haram' or 'It is halal,' as haram and halal are terms of much greater import. (AI-Umm, vol. 7, p. 317.)
This
is what Abu Yusuf has reported concerning our righteous forebearers and what
al-Shafi'i has quoted from him, in agreement with his position. Similarly, Ibn
Muflih reported the great scholar Ibn Taymiyyah, as saying that the jurists of
the early days of Islam did not term anything haram unless it was
definitely known to be so. (This is further supported by the
fact that the companions did not give up the drinking of alcohol after the
revelation of the Qur'anic verse, "They ask thee concerning wine and
gambling. Say: In them is great sin and some benefit," (Holy Quran
Chapter 2:219) since this verse did not definitely
prohibit drinking prior to the revelation of the verses in Surah al-Maida. (Holy Quran
Chapter 5:93-94 (90-91)) In the same spirit, the
great imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal,
when asked about some matter, would say, "I disapprove of it" or
"It does not appeal to me," or "I do not like it" or
"I do not prefer it." Similar reports are narrated concerning Malik,
Abu Hanifah, and all the otherimams (may Allah be
pleased with them). (This is a lesson to the followers
of such imams who freely use the
word "haram' without having a
proof, or even a semblance of proof.)
No comments:
Post a Comment